Peer Review Process

Journal of Information Technology and System Integration (JITSI) implements a Double-Blind Peer Review process to ensure the quality, originality, and scientific contribution of published articles.

In the double-blind review process, the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed from each other throughout the review process.

Review Procedure

1. Initial Submission

Authors submit manuscripts through the JITSI Online Submission System.

2. Editorial Screening

The Editor-in-Chief or Managing Editor conducts an initial evaluation to assess:

  • Relevance to the journal's scope
  • Compliance with author guidelines
  • Originality and scientific merit
  • Completeness of manuscript components

Manuscripts that do not meet the journal requirements may be rejected before peer review.

3. Plagiarism Screening

All manuscripts are checked using plagiarism detection software.

JITSI only considers manuscripts with a similarity index of 20% or below, excluding references and properly cited quotations.

4. Double-Blind Peer Review

Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field.

Reviewers evaluate:

  • Originality
  • Scientific contribution
  • Research methodology
  • Technical quality
  • Clarity of presentation
  • Validity of conclusions
  • Relevance to the journal scope

5. Review Decision

Based on reviewers' recommendations, the editor may decide:

  • Accept Submission
  • Revisions Required
  • Resubmit for Review
  • Decline Submission

6. Author Revision

Authors are required to revise their manuscripts according to reviewers' comments and submit the revised version within the specified period.

7. Final Decision

The Editor-in-Chief makes the final publication decision based on reviewers' recommendations and the quality of revisions.

8. Copyediting and Production

Accepted manuscripts proceed to:

  • Copyediting
  • Layout Editing
  • Proofreading
  • Final Publication

Review Timeline

The average review process is as follows:

Process Estimated Time
Editorial Screening 1–2 Weeks
Peer Review 2–4 Weeks
Author Revision 1–3 Weeks
Final Decision 1 Week

The total review and publication process typically takes 4–10 weeks, depending on the quality of the manuscript and the responsiveness of authors and reviewers.

Publication Ethics

All editors, reviewers, and authors are expected to adhere to the ethical standards established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

JITSI is committed to maintaining confidentiality, objectivity, transparency, and academic integrity throughout the peer review process.